Nicholas Stoica v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter C, et al
| NICHOLAS D. STOICA |
| MCDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER COMPANY, INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA and BOEING CORPORATION |
| 21-15279 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| NICHOLAS STOICA V. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER C |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is therefore unnecessary. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12063821] (JMR) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Nicholas D. Stoica motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/24/2021. [12055269] (QDL) [Entered: 03/26/2021 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. By March 23, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The submission is a confidential mediation communication protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and should not be filed with the court. Instead, the written response to this order should either be mailed or emailed to the addresses below. Via mail: Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediator, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939. Via email: robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov. For more detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see the attachment to this order and the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12029898] (JMR) [Entered: 03/09/2021 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/04/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12024399]. [21-15279] (AD) [Entered: 03/04/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee Industrial Commission of Arizona Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/04/2021. [12024106] [21-15279] (Sillyman, Michael) [Entered: 03/04/2021 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nicholas D. Stoica opening brief due 04/21/2021. Appellees Boeing Corporation, Industrial Commission of Arizona and McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company answering brief due 05/21/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12008241] (RT) [Entered: 02/18/2021 11:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
