Donnell Bledsoe v. Leatuge, et al
| DONNELL BLEDSOE |
| CHRISTEN, MICHELL, MARTINEZ, Sgt., LEATUGE and SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL |
| 21-15280 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDS, BSB and PJB) [12060304] (QDL) [Entered: 04/01/2021 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., BRIDGET S. BADE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Medhekar v. United States Dist. Court, 99 F.3d 325, 326 (9th Cir. 1996) (discovery orders not immediately appealable); see also Cunningham v. Hamilton County, 527 U.S. 198 (1999) (Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 37 sanctions order imposed on attorney not final decision under 28 U.S.C. 1291 or immediately appealable as collateral order); Riverhead Sav. Bank v. Natl Mortgage Equity Corp., 893 F.2d 1109, 1113 (9th Cir. 1990) (civil sanctions order imposed on party is not immediately appealable as collateral order). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12031459] (JMR) [Entered: 03/10/2021 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Donnell Bledsoe opening brief due 04/19/2021. Appellees Martinez and San Joaquin County Jail answering brief due 05/17/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12007972] (JPD) [Entered: 02/18/2021 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
