Michael Witkin v. Hagerman, et al
MICHAEL AARON WITKIN |
R. BRIGGS, HAGERMAN, Sgt., R. COKER, P. KELLY, VOONG, D. WISE, D. WAGNER, R. NEUSCHMID and ROSSI |
21-15345 |
February 26, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Aaron Witkin motion to reconsider . Deficiencies: None. [12057291] (JFF) [Entered: 03/29/2021 05:06 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., BRIDGET S. BADE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12039290] (OC) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:00 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Aaron Witkin opening brief due 04/26/2021. Appellees R. Briggs, R. Coker, Hagerman, P. Kelly, R. Neuschmid, Rossi, Voong, D. Wagner and D. Wise answering brief due 05/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12018324] (JPD) [Entered: 02/26/2021 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.