Arthur Jones, Sr. v. Sam Wong, et al
Defendant / Appellee: CUPPY, Physicians Assistant, SAM WONG, Dr., ADAM PACE, WILLIAM S. HEATLEY, Dr. and WILLIAMS, Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARTHUR GLENN JONES, Sr.
Case Number: 21-15348
Filed: March 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 24, 2022 ARTHUR JONES, SR. V. SAM WONG

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Arthur Glenn Jones, Sr. letter dated 04/06/2021 re: $505 fee payment coming soon. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12069913] (RL) [Entered: 04/09/2021 04:03 PM]
April 9, 2021 Filing 3 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Arthur Glenn Jones, Sr. opening brief of 16 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 04/06/2021. [12069829] (LA) [Entered: 04/09/2021 03:35 PM]
March 3, 2021 Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12023074] (CKP) [Entered: 03/03/2021 01:42 PM]
March 1, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Arthur Glenn Jones Sr. opening brief due 04/26/2021. Appellees Sam Wong, et al. answering brief due 05/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12019188] (JPD) [Entered: 03/01/2021 08:48 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Arthur Jones, Sr. v. Sam Wong, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CUPPY, Physicians Assistant
Represented By: Scott W. Foley
Represented By: Thomas A. Cregger Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAM WONG, Dr.
Represented By: Christine Garske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ADAM PACE
Represented By: Christine Garske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM S. HEATLEY, Dr.
Represented By: Christine Garske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WILLIAMS, Dr.
Represented By: Christine Garske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ARTHUR GLENN JONES, Sr.
Represented By: Arthur Glenn Jones Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?