Chandra Kishor v. State of California, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHANDRA KISHOR
Defendant / Appellee: GERTRUDE CROSSLAND, MICHAEL BOWMAN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and N. RYE, Detective
Case Number: 21-15372
Filed: March 4, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on March 29, 2021, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12076446] (JMR) [Entered: 04/15/2021 05:00 PM]
April 12, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Chandra Kishor motion for permission for successive writ. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/06/2021. [12072105] (QDL) [Entered: 04/13/2021 09:22 AM]
March 29, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Chandra Kishor motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12058735] (QDL) [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:20 PM]
March 29, 2021 Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Chandra Kishor opening brief of 19 pages (Informal: No). Served on 03/30/2021. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: fees are due, no certificate of service on appellee's counsel. [12057995] (KWG) [Entered: 03/30/2021 10:43 AM]
March 8, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12027487] (CKP) [Entered: 03/08/2021 11:43 AM]
March 4, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Chandra Kishor opening brief due 04/06/2021. Appellees Michael Bowman, Gertrude Crossland, N. Rye and State of California answering brief due 05/06/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12024015] (JMR) [Entered: 03/04/2021 10:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chandra Kishor v. State of California, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHANDRA KISHOR
Represented By: Chandra Kishor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GERTRUDE CROSSLAND
Represented By: Allen R. Crown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL BOWMAN
Represented By: Allen R. Crown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Represented By: Allen R. Crown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: N. RYE, Detective
Represented By: Allen R. Crown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?