Miguel Torres v. Ismail Patel, et al
| S. SERDA, W. ULIT, Dr. at KVSP, SPECIAL APPEARANCE, ISMAIL PATEL, Dr. at KVSP, MARTA SPAETH, CP&S, UPPAL, B. JOHN and MANASRAH, R.N. |
| MIGUEL TORRES |
| 21-15412 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Miguel Torres motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/08/2021. [12075889] (DJV) [Entered: 04/15/2021 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant Miguel Torres opening brief of 13 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 04/15/2021 by Court via CM/ECF. Filed with minor deficiency: no certificate of service on appellee's counsel. [12075440] (LA) [Entered: 04/15/2021 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12065527] (CKP) [Entered: 04/06/2021 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 03/25/2021. [Case Number 21-15412: Partially Paid] [12063162] (DJV) [Entered: 04/05/2021 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12032626] (CKP) [Entered: 03/11/2021 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Miguel Torres opening brief due 05/04/2021. Appellees Ismail Patel, et al. answering brief due 06/03/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12029213] (JPD) [Entered: 03/09/2021 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
