Lam Quan v. Merrick Garland, et al
| DAVID JENNINGS, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, NATHAN ALLEN, CHAD F. WOLF and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| LAM VI QUAN |
| 21-15416 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Streamlined request [16] by Appellant Lam Vi Quan to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Lam Vi Quan opening brief due 06/10/2021. Appellees Matthew T. Albence, Nathan Allen, David Jennings, Chad F. Wolf and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General answering brief due 07/12/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12104893] (DLM) [Entered: 05/06/2021 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Lam Vi Quan. New requested due date is 06/10/2021. [12104831] [21-15416] (Cooper, Holly) [Entered: 05/06/2021 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 15 Appellee William P. Barr in 21-15416 substituted by Appellee Merrick B. Garland in 21-15416 [12101261] (TYL) [Entered: 05/04/2021 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lam Vi Quan reply to response (). Date of service: 04/28/2021. [12090290] [21-15416] (Cooper, Holly) [Entered: 04/28/2021 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellees Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr, David Jennings and Chad F. Wolf response opposing motion ([ # 10 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 10 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 04/21/2021. [12082881] [21-15416] (Ramus, Michelle) [Entered: 04/21/2021 07:06 PM] |
| Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [11]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Lam Vi Quan Correspondence: Form 15. Date of service: 04/13/2021 [12072329] [21-15416] (Cooper, Holly) [Entered: 04/13/2021 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) UNDER SEAL Appellant Lam Vi Quan motion to file document under seal and submit sealed document. Type of document: excerpts of record. Date of service: 04/12/2021. [12071578] [21-15416]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDFs. 04/15/2021 by LA] (Cooper, Holly) [Entered: 04/12/2021 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lam Vi Quan Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion For Interim Release Pursuant to FRAP 23(b)]. Date of service: 04/12/2021. [12071569] [21-15416] (Cooper, Holly) [Entered: 04/12/2021 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal on March 17, 2021. Accordingly, appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed in this court (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is unnecessary. The Clerk has updated the docket to reflect appellants in forma pauperis status. The opening brief is due May 11, 2021. The answering brief is due June 11, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12047982] (RY) [Entered: 03/19/2021 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/18/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12046859]. [21-15416] (AD) [Entered: 03/18/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-15416: IFP] ). [12046794] (TSP) [Entered: 03/18/2021 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lam Vi Quan Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/18/2021. [12046777] [21-15416] (Cooper, Holly) [Entered: 03/18/2021 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12046245] (LW) [Entered: 03/18/2021 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lam Vi Quan Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 03/16/2021. [12043489] [21-15416] (Cooper, Holly) [Entered: 03/16/2021 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Michelle M. Ramus for party(s) Appellee William P. Barr Appellee David Jennings Appellee Chad F. Wolf Appellee Matthew T. Albence, in case 21-15416. [12043050] (NAC) [Entered: 03/16/2021 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michelle Marie Ramus (U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation-District Court Section P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044) for Appellees Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr, David Jennings and Chad F. Wolf. Date of service: 03/16/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12043020] [21-15416] (Ramus, Michelle) [Entered: 03/16/2021 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lam Vi Quan Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/16/2021. Appellant Lam Vi Quan opening brief due 05/11/2021. Appellees Matthew T. Albence, Nathan Allen, William P. Barr, Attorney General, David Jennings and Chad F. Wolf answering brief due 06/11/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12029574] (RT) [Entered: 03/09/2021 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
