Jesse Fink v. The Hanover Insurance Group, et al
| JESSE FINK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, DBA Toy Boat Dessert Cafe |
| MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY and THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. |
| 21-15421 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KS): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) to stay appellate proceedings is granted. The previously established briefing schedule is vacated. Appellate proceedings are stayed until resolution of Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America, No. 20-16858, or until further order of this court. Appellant shall file a status report on August 2, 2021 and every 90 days thereafter while Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America is pending. Appellant shall notify the court by filing a status report within 7 days of the resolution of Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America. Failure to file a status report will terminate the stay of appellate proceedings. The briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [12100990] (WL) [Entered: 05/04/2021 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jesse Fink Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 11/05/2021. Date of service: 04/16/2021. [12078130] [21-15421] (Smith, Nathan) [Entered: 04/16/2021 06:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12068734] (BLS) [Entered: 04/08/2021 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/05/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12049714] (BLS) [Entered: 03/22/2021 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/16/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12042986]. [21-15421] (AD) [Entered: 03/16/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jesse Fink Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/16/2021. [12042912] [21-15421] (Smith, Nathan) [Entered: 03/16/2021 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Mark G. Bonino for party(s) Appellee Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company Appellee The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., in case 21-15421. [12039333] (RR) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Mark G. Bonino (Hayes, Scott, Bonino, Ellingson, Guslani, Simonson & Clause, LLP) for Appellees Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company and The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.. Date of service: 03/12/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12039189] [21-15421] (Bonino, Mark) [Entered: 03/12/2021 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jesse Fink Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/17/2021. Appellant Jesse Fink opening brief due 05/10/2021. Appellees Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company and The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. answering brief due 06/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12030756] (JMR) [Entered: 03/10/2021 11:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jesse Fink v. The Hanover Insurance Group, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JESSE FINK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, DBA Toy Boat Dessert Cafe | |
| Represented By: | Todd S. Garber |
| Represented By: | Douglas Gregory Blankinship |
| Represented By: | Nathan M. Smith Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Keller |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Hayes Esquire |
| Represented By: | Mark G. Bonino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Keller |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Hayes Esquire |
| Represented By: | Mark G. Bonino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
