Tony Fu v. City and County of San Franci, et al
| MARK W. LAPHAM, Esquire, THAI MING CHU, LEGAL RECOVERY, LLC, DEMAS WAI YAN, Esquire and TINA YAN |
| CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and MATTHEW P. SULLIVAN, an individual and in his official capacities |
| TONY FU |
| 21-15423 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TONY FU V. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCI |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: th): Granting Motion [ # 2 ] to extend time to file appellant brief filed by Appellant Mr. Tony Fu. Appellant Tony Fu opening brief due 08/10/2021. Appellees City and County of San Francisco and Matthew P. Sullivan answering brief due 09/09/2021 The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12064678] (TH) [Entered: 04/06/2021 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Mr. Tony Fu motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 08/10/2021. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/16/2021. [12044232] (RR) [Entered: 03/17/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tony Fu opening brief due 05/10/2021. Appellees City and County of San Francisco and Matthew P. Sullivan answering brief due 06/10/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12030911] (RT) [Entered: 03/10/2021 12:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
