Tatyana Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System, et al
Defendant / Appellee: CATHERINE DALY, JOAN HEALY, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, BOBBIT SANTOS, ERIC ROOD and DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Plaintiff / Appellant: TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Case Number: 21-15460
Filed: March 15, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2021 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva EMERGENCY Motion to remand case. Date of service: 04/26/2021. [12086083] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 04/26/2021 08:52 AM]
April 25, 2021 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva EMERGENCY Motion to assign case to prior panel. Date of service: 04/25/2021. [12085884] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 04/25/2021 10:26 AM]
April 25, 2021 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva EMERGENCY Motion to remand case. Date of service: 04/25/2021. [12085879] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 04/25/2021 07:40 AM]
April 8, 2021 Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellants motion for an extension of time to respond to the courts March 19, 2021 order (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]) is granted. Appellants response is due May 24, 2021. Briefing remains suspended. [12067758] (OC) [Entered: 04/08/2021 10:33 AM]
April 6, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva Supplemental Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 03/19/2021. Date of service: 04/06/2021. [12065849] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 04/06/2021 05:29 PM]
March 19, 2021 Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. All pending motions will be addressed following appellants compliance with this order. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12047236] (OC) [Entered: 03/19/2021 10:11 AM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva EMERGENCY Motion for sanctions. Date of service: 03/16/2021. [12043708] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 03/16/2021 08:30 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva EMERGENCY Motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. Date of service: 03/16/2021. [12043706] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 03/16/2021 08:10 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva EMERGENCY Motion for sanctions. Date of service: 03/16/2021. [12043701] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 03/16/2021 07:45 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 03/16/2021. [12043680] [21-15460] (Drevaleva, Tatyana) [Entered: 03/16/2021 05:44 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12043298] (CKP) [Entered: 03/16/2021 02:47 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-15460: Due] ). [12042976] (CO) [Entered: 03/16/2021 12:42 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12042662] (RL) [Entered: 03/16/2021 10:35 AM]
March 15, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva opening brief due 05/17/2021. Appellees Alameda Health System, Catherine Daly, Department of Industrial Relations, Joan Healy, Eric Rood and Bobbit Santos answering brief due 06/17/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12041754] (RT) [Entered: 03/15/2021 03:56 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tatyana Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CATHERINE DALY
Represented By: Nicholas Seitz Esquire
Represented By: Doris Ng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOAN HEALY
Represented By: Nicholas Seitz Esquire
Represented By: Doris Ng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM
Represented By: Timothy Travelstead Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BOBBIT SANTOS
Represented By: Nicholas Seitz Esquire
Represented By: Doris Ng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ERIC ROOD
Represented By: Nicholas Seitz Esquire
Represented By: Doris Ng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Represented By: Nicholas Seitz Esquire
Represented By: Doris Ng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Represented By: Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?