Ossie Giles v. Ron Davis, et al
| M. NELSON |
| J. KNIGHT, F. JAUGAN, C.O., J. SANGMASTER, Sgt., R. BLOOMFIELD, A.W., RON DAVIS, M. BLOISE, I. RAMOS, M. VOONG, C.O.A., R. SHELTON, Lt., Y. SAMARA, CDO, A. MAXFIELD, CC2, R. PEARL, Psychologist, R. M. BALLEIN, G. FORNCROOK, A.W., MADDING, Sgt., J. ARNOLD, Cpt., V. MICHAEL, Correction Officer and J. CARTWRIGHT, C.O. |
| OSSIE GILES |
| 21-15466 |
| March 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request received on 04/16/2021. [12081958] (JR) [Entered: 04/21/2021 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON and DANIEL A. BRESS) Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. Appellants motion to dismiss certain appellees (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. The Clerk shall remove appellees Madding, Michael, Ballein, Bloise, Knight, and Ramos from the docket. The opening brief is due May 25, 2021; the answering brief is due June 24, 2021; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. Id. [12077026] (JBS) [Entered: 04/16/2021 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 9 Streamlined request by Appellant Ossie Giles to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12074180] (BG) [Entered: 04/14/2021 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Ossie Giles motion to dismiss identified parties. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/28/2021. [12062560] (RL) [Entered: 04/02/2021 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12054938] (CKP) [Entered: 03/26/2021 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his Form 29 of request filed on 03/25/2021. [12054199] (JR) [Entered: 03/26/2021 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Ossie Giles FORM 29 request for Rules book. dated 03/21/2021. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12053721] (RL) [Entered: 03/25/2021 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ossie Giles FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/21/2021. [12053718] (RL) [Entered: 03/25/2021 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 03/21/2021. [Case Number 21-15466: Partially Paid] [12053714] (RL) [Entered: 03/25/2021 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12044848] (CKP) [Entered: 03/17/2021 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ossie Giles opening brief due 05/11/2021. Appellees Ron Davis, et al. answering brief due 06/10/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12043201] (JPD) [Entered: 03/16/2021 02:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
