Alfred Caraffa v. Tempe Police Department, et al
| ALFRED E. CARAFFA |
| UNKNOWN PARTY, Allied Universal Security Guard, UNKNOWN PARTY, Manager of the Tempe Public Historical Library, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Tempe Police Officers 1-5, CITY OF TEMPE, UNKNOWN PARTY, Female at front desk at Tempe Public Historical Library, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Mayor of Tempe, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Trident Security Guards 1-2, GUAJARDO, First name unknown; named as P.O. Guajardo #23599 Tempe Police Officer, ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY, INC., CITY OF TEMPE PUBLIC HISTORICAL LIBRARY, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Chief of Police in Tempe, PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT, TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHOENIX and TRIDENT SECURITY CORPORATION, INC. |
| 21-15482 |
| March 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED. (RRC, MHM and DAB) [12105339] (DJV) [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet for this appeal as well as DE numbers 1-4 in response to the Form 29 request received on 04/20/2021. Also sent the docket sheet for 20-16653 and sent DE 28 for 20-16246 and for 20-16295 sent DE numbers 13 and18 and for 20-16840 sent DE 13 all in response to the Form 29 request received on 04/20/2021. [12081361] (JR) [Entered: 04/20/2021 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 Received Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa request for docket sheets. [12081217] (NAC) [Entered: 04/20/2021 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, MARY H. MURGUIA and DANIEL A. BRESS): The district court terminated this action pursuant to appellants notice of voluntary dismissal on April 23, 2020. This appeal challenges the magistrate judges March 3, 2021 order denying appellants motion to proceed to trial in the voluntarily dismissed action. A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 3, 2021 magistrate judge order is not an appealable final order. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12076451] (AF) [Entered: 04/15/2021 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion for default judgment. Deficiencies: None. [12072481] (NAC) [Entered: 04/13/2021 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa letter dated 03/31/2021 re: Notice of additional defendants to civil action appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12071809] (QDL) [Entered: 04/12/2021 09:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa opening brief due 05/14/2021. [12044524] (JMR) [Entered: 03/17/2021 01:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
