Michael Fuqua v. Raak, et al
| HALL, Sgt., THOMAS, Chaplain, COCA, CO III, GOLDER, ADW, MCCHESNEY, CO IV, GANT, CO III, PUCKET, Lt., BAKER, Sgt., SWIRSKY, Captain, RUSSLE, CO III, GRIMES, Sgt., D. LABAR, AFHA, VAN DER NOORD, Sgt., J. LIND, Chaplain, TROMAN, CO III, BAKER, Captain, OSHITA, Lt., GONZELEZ, Sgt., LOREN, Sgt., ROXANNE HILL, D.W., KIRKOFF, D.W., MACLARENS, Chaplain, MOONEY, D.W., RODE, Deputy Warden, OSHITA, CO IV, HUDSON, CO III, JONES, MCGEE, Ph.D., D. WEBSTER, Ph.D., CHARLES L. RYAN, C. CATRELL, D.W., RAAK, Psychologist, SWAYNE, CO III, HIGUERA, KINGSLAND, Sr. Chaplain, SHAW, Ph.D., LUFT, Sgt., KRAATZ, ADW, K. RODGERS, FHA, SUCKLE, Captain, MOVA, CO II, METZLER, CO IV and HORN, Lt. |
| MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua |
| 21-15492 |
| March 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Michael Ray Fuqua motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12065402] (NAC) [Entered: 04/06/2021 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Ray Fuqua motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None [12065400] (NAC) [Entered: 04/06/2021 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12053495] (CKP) [Entered: 03/25/2021 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Ray Fuqua opening brief due 05/17/2021. Appellee J. Lind answering brief due 06/15/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12046617] (JPD) [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
