Sundance Media Group, LLC v. Yuneec USA, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUNDANCE MEDIA GROUP, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: YUNEEC USA, INC.
Case Number: 21-15495
Filed: March 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2021 Filing 10 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12109201] (NAC) [Entered: 05/11/2021 01:05 PM]
May 6, 2021 Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 08/24/2021, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant Sundance Media Group, LLC opening brief due 09/15/2021. Appellee Yuneec USA, Inc. answering brief due 10/15/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due within 21 days afer service of the answering brief. See order for details. [12104418] (BLS) [Entered: 05/06/2021 11:19 AM]
April 28, 2021 Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record and the response to this courts March 31, 2021, order reflects that the district court has denied the post-judgment motion. Accordingly, the stay of proceedings is lifted, and briefing may proceed. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due June 28, 2021. The answering brief is due July 28, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12089344] (RT) [Entered: 04/28/2021 08:53 AM]
April 19, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Sundance Media Group, LLC response to Court order dated 03/31/2021. Date of service: 04/19/2021. [12079870] [21-15495] (Tratos, Mark) [Entered: 04/19/2021 06:00 PM]
April 19, 2021 Filing 6 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 7 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Sundance Media Group, LLC response to Court order dated 03/31/2021. Date of service: 04/19/2021. [12079781] [21-15495] (Rabe, Bethany) [Entered: 04/19/2021 05:05 PM]
March 31, 2021 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [12059977] (RT) [Entered: 03/31/2021 04:13 PM]
March 31, 2021 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/05/2021, 9:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12059504] (BLS) [Entered: 03/31/2021 12:25 PM]
March 26, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/26/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12055492]. [21-15495] (AD) [Entered: 03/26/2021 06:44 PM]
March 26, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Sundance Media Group, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/26/2021. [12055240] [21-15495] (Tratos, Mark) [Entered: 03/26/2021 03:43 PM]
March 19, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Sundance Media Group, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/26/2021. Transcript ordered by 04/19/2021. Transcript due 05/17/2021. Appellant Sundance Media Group, LLC opening brief due 06/28/2021. Appellee Yuneec USA, Inc. answering brief due 07/28/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12047273] (JBS) [Entered: 03/19/2021 10:28 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sundance Media Group, LLC v. Yuneec USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SUNDANCE MEDIA GROUP, LLC
Represented By: Mark Tratos
Represented By: Bethany Leigh Rabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: YUNEEC USA, INC.
Represented By: Paul Padda
Represented By: Douglas Quinton Hahn Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?