Kurzie Curtis v. David Shinn, et al
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA |
KURZIE LEE CURTIS |
21-15512 |
March 23, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN): We have received and reviewed appellants response to this courts March 23, 2021, order to show cause. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because the notice of appeal was not timely filed and appellant did not file a motion to extend time for appeal in the district court within the jurisdictional time limit. See 28 U.S.C. 2107, 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12115068] (AF) [Entered: 05/17/2021 11:36 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Kurzie Lee Curtis response to order to show cause of 03/23/21 tiled motion for reconsideration. Served on 03/30/2021. [12065042] (DJV) [Entered: 04/06/2021 11:23 AM] |
Filing 5 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Filed Appellant Kurzie Lee Curtis motion to reconsider order of Staff Attorneys filed on 03/23/2021. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/30/2021. [12063186] (DJV) [Entered: 04/05/2021 09:50 AM] |
Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/29/2021 denying the Application for Certificate of Appealability from District Court and Statement of Reasons in Support. [12057225] (QDL) [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:45 PM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court filed on 03/22/2021. [12052416] (QDL) [Entered: 03/24/2021 03:59 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): The record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the request for certificate of appealability because the notice of appeal was not filed or deposited for mailing in the prisons internal mail system within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment on February 8, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). Within 21 days after this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this request for certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this request for certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [12050853] (AF) [Entered: 03/23/2021 01:26 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 02/08/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12050291] (JMR) [Entered: 03/23/2021 09:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.