Marshall Khan v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARSHALL A. KHAN
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 21-15544
Filed: March 26, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2021 Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on April 26, 2021, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12120737] (OC) [Entered: 05/21/2021 10:20 AM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Marshall A. Khan motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12105851] (JFF) [Entered: 05/07/2021 12:23 PM]
April 26, 2021 Filing 5 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Marshall A. Khan opening brief of 19 pages (Informal: No). Served on 04/05/2021. Major deficiency: fees are due. Notified Appellant. [12087935] (KWG) [Entered: 04/27/2021 09:31 AM]
April 26, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Marshall A. Khan letter dated 04/05/2021 re: General information regarding social security disability. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12087227] (QDL) [Entered: 04/26/2021 04:01 PM]
April 21, 2021 Filing 3 Mail returned on 04/19/2021 addressed to Marshall A. Khan, re: [ # 2 ] Clerk Order. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [12082751] (JMR) [Entered: 04/21/2021 04:23 PM]
April 5, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12063819] (CKP) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:05 PM]
March 26, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Marshall A. Khan opening brief due 05/24/2021. [12054201] (JMR) [Entered: 03/26/2021 09:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marshall Khan v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARSHALL A. KHAN
Represented By: Marshall A. Khan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?