Kevin Shelby v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.
| KEVIN M. SHELBY |
| BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., an Arizona corporation |
| 21-15547 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KEVIN SHELBY V. BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ appellant only, 04/29/2021, 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12087902] (BLS) [Entered: 04/27/2021 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 04/26/2021, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12069833] (BLS) [Entered: 04/09/2021 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Kimberly M. Shappley for party(s) Appellee Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., in case 21-15547. [12062113] (NAC) [Entered: 04/02/2021 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kimberly Marie Shappley (Littler Mendelson; 2425 E Camelback Rd., Suite 900, Phoenix, AZ 85016) for Appellee Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.. Date of service: 04/02/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12062103] [21-15547] (Shappley, Kimberly) [Entered: 04/02/2021 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/02/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12062021]. [21-15547] (AD) [Entered: 04/02/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kevin M. Shelby Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/02/2021. [12061975] [21-15547] (Carden, Joshua) [Entered: 04/02/2021 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kevin M. Shelby Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/02/2021. Transcript ordered by 04/26/2021. Transcript due 05/24/2021. Appellant Kevin M. Shelby opening brief due 07/06/2021. Appellee Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. answering brief due 08/05/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12054269] (JBS) [Entered: 03/26/2021 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kevin Shelby v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: KEVIN M. SHELBY | |
| Represented By: | Joshua William Carden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., an Arizona corporation | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly M. Shappley |
| Represented By: | Robert Shawn Oller Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
