Big Sky Civil TR, et al v. Oath Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff: DAVID STEVEN BRAUN, TTEE
Plaintiff / Appellant: BIG SKY CIVIL TR
Defendant / Appellee: OATH HOLDINGS, INC.
Case Number: 21-15563
Filed: March 30, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 28, 2022 BIG SKY CIVIL TR V. OATH HOLDINGS, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Oath Holdings, Inc. reply to response to order to show cause dated 04/02/2021. Date of service: 04/15/2021. [12075777] [21-15563] (Kendall, Jamie) [Entered: 04/15/2021 01:03 PM]
April 5, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Big Sky Civil TR response to order to show cause. Served on 04/03/2021. [12064396] (RL) [Entered: 04/05/2021 07:28 PM]
April 2, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts judgment was entered on the docket on February 19, 2021. Appellants notice of appeal was filed in the district court on March 30, 2021. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12062502] (CKP) [Entered: 04/02/2021 03:47 PM]
March 30, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Big Sky Civil TR opening brief due 06/01/2021. Appellee Oath Holdings, Inc. answering brief due 06/28/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12058038] (JPD) [Entered: 03/30/2021 10:57 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Big Sky Civil TR, et al v. Oath Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BIG SKY CIVIL TR
Represented By: Big Sky Civil TR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID STEVEN BRAUN, TTEE
Represented By: David Steven Braun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OATH HOLDINGS, INC.
Represented By: Jamie Olivia Kendall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?