DaJuan Williams v. Winget, et al
VERDUGO, Correctional Officer, COII at ASPC-Eyman, SHERIDAN, Correctional Officer Administrator/Grievance Coordinator, COIV at ASPC-Eyman, VILLANUEVA, #8449; Correctional Officer, Sergeant at ASPC-Eyman, WINGET, Sgt. #11379; Correctional Officer, Sergeant at ASPC-Eyman, J. SILVES, #8185; Correctional Officer, Captain/Disciplinary Hearing Officer at ASPC-Eyman, DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, ROWLEY, COIII #12365, NATALYA WEIGEL, Contract Nurse Practitioner, Provider at ASPC-Eyman, PANANN DAYS, Deputy Warden, Administrator at ASPC-Eyman, TAYLOR, ADC Maintenance Eployee and/or Contractor; "Maintenance" at ASPC-Eyman, AVENTNITI, ADC Maintenance Eployee and/or Contractor; "Maintenance" at ASPC-Eyman, RUBEN CORNEJO, CO II #1578, JOAN GRAFTON, Provider, TRIBOLET, COII Tribolet #10675; Correctional Officer, COII at ASPC-Eyman, MICHAEL A. KINNEY, #7948; Correctional Officer, COIII at ASPC-Eyman, JOSE LOPEZ, CO II #12087, CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADC, Administrator, ADC Central Office, PLANCARTE, Correctional Officer, COII at ASPC-Eyman, J. GRAFTON, Contract Nurse Practitioner, Provider at ASPC-Florence, VALENCIA, Correctional Officer, COII, ADOLFO ORTIZ, Contract Nurse Practitioner, Provider at ASPC-Eyman, EVA K. SHERIDAN, CO IV, SHY, #2636; Correctional Officer, COIII/Disciplinary Coordinator at ASPC-Eyman, KINNEY, Correctional Officer, COII at ASPC-Eyman and BERNARDO VILLANUEVA, Sgt #8449 |
DAJUAN WILLIAMS |
21-15601 |
April 5, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (RRC, MHM and DAB) [12110009] (DJV) [Entered: 05/12/2021 07:35 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, MARY H. MURGUIA and DANIEL A. BRESS): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12080656] (AF) [Entered: 04/20/2021 11:38 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant DaJuan Williams opening brief due 06/01/2021. Appellees Winget, et al. answering brief due 06/30/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12063825] (JPD) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.