James Luedtke v. A. Ciolli, et al
| KATHLEEN S. SAWYER, BOP Director, DANIEL COGGIN, Counselor at USP Atwater and A. CIOLLI, Warden at USP Atwater |
| JAMES LUEDTKE |
| 21-15605 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant James Luedtke motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/25/2021. [12100171] (DJV) [Entered: 05/03/2021 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 6 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant James Luedtke opening brief of 13 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 04/18/2021. Major deficiencies: briefing is stayed (motion to appoint counsel is pending), fees are due. [12082355] (LA) [Entered: 04/21/2021 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant James Luedtke letter dated 04/18/2021 re: addendum to de 4. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12082165] (DJV) [Entered: 04/21/2021 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant James Luedtke motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/18/2021. [12082151] (DJV) [Entered: 04/21/2021 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12080676] (CKP) [Entered: 04/20/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-15605: Due] ). [12080673] (CKP) [Entered: 04/20/2021 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James Luedtke opening brief due 06/01/2021.. [12063952] (JPD) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
