Racardo Jackson v. Martin Biter
Petitioner: RACARDO JACKSON
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Warden and KEN CLARK, Warden
Case Number: 21-15676
Filed: April 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 21, 2023 RACARDO JACKSON V. KEN CLARK

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2021 Filing 8 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Michael Bradley Bigelow, Esquire for Racardo Jackson and Racardo Jackson) [12139116] (BJK) [Entered: 06/09/2021 02:02 PM]
June 9, 2021 Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellant Ken Clark to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Ken Clark, Warden opening brief due 07/21/2021. Appellee Racardo Jackson answering brief due 08/20/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12138998] (JN) [Entered: 06/09/2021 01:19 PM]
June 9, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Ken Clark. New requested due date is 07/21/2021. [12138969] [21-15676] (Ott, Gregory) [Entered: 06/09/2021 01:03 PM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Racardo Jackson Correspondence: Request to correct counsel designation from retained to CJA Appointed. Date of service: 05/04/2021 [12101655] [21-15676] (Bigelow, Michael) [Entered: 05/04/2021 01:38 PM]
April 22, 2021 Filing 4 Appellant Martin Biter in 21-15676 substituted by Appellant Ken Clark in 21-15676 [12083331] (RR) [Entered: 04/22/2021 10:48 AM]
April 21, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Martin Biter Correspondence: Letter to court re change of custodian. Date of service: 04/21/2021 [12081847] [21-15676] (Ott, Gregory) [Entered: 04/21/2021 09:13 AM]
April 19, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee Racardo Jackson Correspondence: Request to correct status of counsel from retained to CJA appointed. Date of service: 04/19/2021 [12079919] [21-15676] (Bigelow, Michael) [Entered: 04/19/2021 07:59 PM]
April 19, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Martin Biter, Warden opening brief due 06/21/2021. Appellee Racardo Jackson answering brief due 07/21/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12079179] (RT) [Entered: 04/19/2021 01:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Racardo Jackson v. Martin Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARTIN BITER, Warden
Represented By: Gregory A. Ott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KEN CLARK, Warden
Represented By: Gregory A. Ott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RACARDO JACKSON
Represented By: Michael Bradley Bigelow Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?