USA v. Reuben Hayes
| REUBEN EARL HAYES |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-15685 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: David Annicchiarico for Reuben Earl Hayes) [12136175] (BJK) [Entered: 06/07/2021 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (Interim Appellate Commissioner): David L. Annicchiaricos renewed motion to be relieved as appellants counsel of record (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). The Clerk will serve a copy of this order on appellant Reuben Hayes, Reg. No. 18202-111, USP Victorville, P.O. Box 3900, Adelanto, CA 92301, and will update the docket to reflect that appellant is proceeding pro se. The motion for appointment of substitute counsel is referred to the panel that will resolve the merits of appellants request for a certificate of appealability. (COA) [12107334] (JPD) [Entered: 05/10/2021 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Reuben Earl Hayes motion. Attorney(s) Attorney David Annicchiarico for Appellant Reuben Earl Hayes motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 05/05/2021. [12103668] [21-15685] (Annicchiarico, David) [Entered: 05/05/2021 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (Interim Appellate Commissioner): David L. Annicchiaricos motion to be relieved as appellants counsel of record (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied without prejudice to renewal within 21 days after this order. Any renewed motion must include appellants current address and proof that the motion was served on appellant. (COA) [12101761] (JPD) [Entered: 05/04/2021 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Reuben Earl Hayes motion. Attorney(s) Attorney David Annicchiarico for Appellant Reuben Earl Hayes motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 04/27/2021. [12088513] [21-15685] (Annicchiarico, David) [Entered: 04/27/2021 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Merry Jean Chan in 21-15685 substituted by Attorney Matthew Martin Yelovich in 21-15685 [12080092] (NAC) [Entered: 04/20/2021 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew Martin Yelovich (U.S. Attorney's Office,450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102) for Appellee USA. Substitution for Attorney Merry Jean Chan for Appellee USA. Date of service: 04/20/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12080088] [21-15685] (Yelovich, Matthew) [Entered: 04/20/2021 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/13/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12079498] (JBS) [Entered: 04/19/2021 03:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Reuben Hayes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: REUBEN EARL HAYES | |
| Represented By: | David Annicchiarico |
| Represented By: | Reuben Earl Hayes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Martin Yelovich |
| Represented By: | Frank Riebli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
