Christopher Ferguson v. Chad Baker, et al
| CHRISTOPHER EDWARD FERGUSON |
| MCKENZIE, Officer Sergent, CHAD BAKER, officer, FAST TOW, INC., LAS VEGAS CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, GARCIA, Sergeant, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, MULLIGAN, Officer Sergent and STATE OF NEVADA |
| 21-15718 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12140875] (AF) [Entered: 06/10/2021 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Christopher Edward Ferguson motion for limited remand to District Court. Deficiencies: None. [12133136] (RR) [Entered: 06/03/2021 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Christopher Edward Ferguson opening brief due 06/21/2021. Appellees Chad Baker, et al. answering brief due 07/21/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12085309] (JPD) [Entered: 04/23/2021 02:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
