Colleen Stewart v. Property and Casualty Insuranc
| PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD |
| COLLEEN STEWART |
| 21-15753 |
| April 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| COLLEEN STEWART V. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANC |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (KS): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. [12145658] (OC) [Entered: 06/16/2021 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Colleen Stewart order requesting 30 days extension of time for my appeal to be heard. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/07/2021. [12144318] (RL) [Entered: 06/15/2021 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By June 11, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (kay_suk@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Kay Suk, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12131617] (OC) [Entered: 06/02/2021 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 Deleted Incorrect Entry [12128292] (CL) [Entered: 05/28/2021 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA ): On May 13, 2021, this court issued an order remanding this case to the district court for the limited purpose of allowing that court to rule on appellants Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) motion to extend time for filing a notice of appeal. On May 20, 2021, the district court granted appellants motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. The limited remand issued on May 13, 2021 is terminated, and this appeal shall proceed. The opening brief is due July 20, 2021. The answering brief is due August 19, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellee must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. [12122823] (OC) [Entered: 05/24/2021 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 05/20/2021 ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time for Appeal is hereby GRANTED. (ECF No. 89.) Pursuant to the instructions set forth by the Ninth Circuit in its May 13, 2021 order (ECF No. 92), the Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Ninth Circuit for Case No. 21-15753. Plaintiff does not need to file a new notice of appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED. [12121257] (RL) [Entered: 05/21/2021 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and DANIELLE J. HUNSAKER) The district court entered judgment on March 18, 2021. On April 21, 2021, appellant filed a notice of appeal and motion for extension of time to appeal. The district court has not yet had an opportunity to rule on the motion to extend time to appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5). This appeal is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of allowing that court to rule on appellants April 21, 2021 motion. The district court is requested to serve a copy of its decision on this court at its earliest convenience. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. If the district court grants the motion to extend the time to appeal, appellant does not need to file a new notice of appeal. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the district judge. [12111923] (OC) [Entered: 05/13/2021 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Colleen Stewart opening brief due 06/21/2021. Appellee Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford answering brief due 07/20/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12088189] (JMR) [Entered: 04/27/2021 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Colleen Stewart v. Property and Casualty Insuranc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD | |
| Represented By: | Ted A. Smith |
| Represented By: | Ann Kathryn Johnston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: COLLEEN STEWART | |
| Represented By: | Colleen Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
