James Hundley v. Romeo Aranas, et al
JAMES DERRICK HUNDLEY, AKA Jamee Deirdre Hundley |
DAVID BEQUETTE, UTILIZATION REVIEW PANEL, KIM ADAMSON, RENEE BAKER, Warden, ROMEO ARANAS, JAMES DZURENDA, MICHAEL MINEV, RUSTY DONNELLY, NAUGHTON and DON POAG |
21-15757 |
April 27, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
JAMES HUNDLEY V. ROMEO ARANAS, ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Terminated Frank Anthony Toddre II for Utilization Review Panel, Don Poag, Naughton, Michael Minev, James Dzurenda, Rusty Donnelly, David Bequette, Renee Baker, Romeo Aranas and Kim Adamson in 21-15757 [12154204] (OC) [Entered: 06/25/2021 09:01 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MKS): Appellees motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) for clarification and request to strike or withdraw the notice of appearance is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that Frank Anthony Toddre, II, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and the Office of the Nevada Attorney General are not counsel of record for appellees. The Clerk will strike the notice of appearance at Docket Entry No. 2. The opening brief is now due July 23, 2021. Because there are no appearances by appellees, briefing will be complete upon the filing of the opening brief. [12154202] (OC) [Entered: 06/25/2021 09:01 AM] |
Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellant James Derrick Hundley to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12143546] (JN) [Entered: 06/14/2021 02:28 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant James Derrick Hundley. New requested due date is 07/23/2021. [12143295] [21-15757] (McLetchie, Margaret) [Entered: 06/14/2021 12:49 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Renee Baker, David Bequette, Rusty Donnelly, James Dzurenda, Michael Minev, Naughton, Don Poag and Utilization Review Panel Motion for miscellaneous relief [DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES' MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AS TO REPRESTENTATIVE STATUS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL]. Date of service: 05/13/2021. [12111636] [21-15757] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 05/13/2021 09:46 AM] |
Filing 4 Terminated Aaron Darnell Ford for Romeo Aranas. [12111512] (RL) [Entered: 05/13/2021 08:57 AM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Frank Anthony Toddre II for party(s) Appellee Michael Minev Appellee Kim Adamson Appellee David Bequette Appellee Romeo Aranas Appellee Don Poag Appellee Utilization Review Panel Appellee Rusty Donnelly Appellee Naughton Appellee James Dzurenda Appellee Renee Baker. [12111510] (RL) [Entered: 05/13/2021 08:56 AM] |
Filing 2 STRICKEN PER ORDER [ # 8 ] Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Frank A. Toddre II (The State of Nevada Attorney General's Office, 555 E. Washington Ave., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellees Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Renee Baker, David Bequette, Rusty Donnelly, James Dzurenda, Michael Minev, Naughton, Don Poag and Utilization Review Panel. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Aaron Darnell Ford, Esquire for Appellee Romeo Aranas. Date of service: 05/12/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12111325] [21-15757] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 05/12/2021 07:54 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James Derrick Hundley opening brief due 06/25/2021. Appellee Romeo Aranas answering brief due 07/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12088642] (JPD) [Entered: 04/27/2021 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.