Laborers' Union Local 872, et al v. City of Las Vegas, et al
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, STEVE SEROKA and JAMES ROBERT COFFIN |
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 872 and THOMAS M. WHITE, AKA Tommy M. White |
21-15772 |
April 28, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
LABORERS' UNION LOCAL 872 V. CITY OF LAS VEGAS |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Attorney Bradford Jerbic in 21-15772 substituted by Attorney Bryan Keith Scott in 21-15772 [12154134] (QDL) [Entered: 06/25/2021 08:30 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Bryan K. Scott (Las Vegas City Attorney's Office, 495 South Main Street, Sixth Floor, Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellee City of Las Vegas. Substitution for Attorney Bradford Jerbic, Esquire for Appellee City of Las Vegas. Date of service: 06/24/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12153993] [21-15772] (Scott, Bryan) [Entered: 06/24/2021 06:15 PM] |
Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Rebecca L. Wolfson for party(s) Appellee City of Las Vegas, in case 21-15772. [12139551] (QDL) [Entered: 06/09/2021 04:22 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Rebecca Wolfson (Las Vegas City Attorney's Office, 495 South Main Street, Sixth Floor, Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellee City of Las Vegas. Date of service: 06/09/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12139505] [21-15772] (Wolfson, Rebecca) [Entered: 06/09/2021 04:07 PM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12137532] (BLS) [Entered: 06/08/2021 12:58 PM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 05/24/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12108000] (BLS) [Entered: 05/10/2021 02:57 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/06/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12104600]. [21-15772] (AD) [Entered: 05/06/2021 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Laborers' International Union North America, Local 872 and Thomas M. White Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/06/2021. [12104167] [21-15772] (Graf, Rusty) [Entered: 05/06/2021 09:54 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Laborers' International Union North America, Local 872 and Thomas M. White Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/05/2021. Transcript ordered by 05/27/2021. Transcript due 06/28/2021. Appellants Laborers' International Union North America, Local 872 and Thomas M. White opening brief due 08/05/2021. Appellees City of Las Vegas, James Robert Coffin and Steve Seroka answering brief due 09/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12089495] (JBS) [Entered: 04/28/2021 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.