Curtis Thornton v. City of Daly City, et al
PATRICK HENSLEY, Daly City Police Department Chief, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, PAUL MENDIARA, HNA GROUP, IAN MADDISON, JONATHAN PREMENKO, STEPHEN WAGSTAFFE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, San Francisco Office, KENNAN, Sergeant, GONSALVES, Officer, CHEN FENG, GATE GOURMET, CITY OF DALY CITY, a municipality and COUNTY OF SAN MATEO |
CURTIS THORNTON |
21-15776 |
April 28, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, MSB and DJF) [12133428] (RR) [Entered: 06/04/2021 06:37 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, MARSHA S. BERZON and DANIELLE J. HUNSAKER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 15, 2021 order challenged in the April 27, 2021 notice of appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all of the claims or parties in action is not immediately appealable unless the district court directs entry of a judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12112164] (JMR) [Entered: 05/13/2021 01:56 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Curtis Thornton opening brief due 06/28/2021. Appellees City of Daly City, et al. answering brief due 07/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12090478] (JPD) [Entered: 04/28/2021 05:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.