Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fu, et al v. Zendesk, Inc., et al
CHARLES REIDINGER and MANDY HO |
NORMAN GENNARO, ADRIAN MCDERMOTT, JOHN GESCHKE and JEFFREY TITTERTON |
MIKKEL SVANE, ZENDESK, INC. and ELENA GOMEZ |
LOCAL 353, I.B.E.W. PENSION FUND, Lead Plaintiff |
21-15785 |
April 29, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
LOCAL 353, I.B.E.W. PENSION FU V. ZENDESK, INC. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund opening brief due 07/29/2021. Appellees Elena Gomez, Mikkel Svane and Zendesk, Inc. answering brief due 08/30/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12131465] (JN) [Entered: 06/02/2021 02:20 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund. New requested due date is 07/29/2021. [12131213] [21-15785] (Daley, Joseph) [Entered: 06/02/2021 12:59 PM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12128141] (CL) [Entered: 05/28/2021 01:00 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 05/27/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12112697] (CL) [Entered: 05/13/2021 06:15 PM] |
Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/06/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12105229]. [21-15785] (AD) [Entered: 05/06/2021 06:44 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/06/2021. [12104818] [21-15785] (Daley, Joseph) [Entered: 05/06/2021 02:11 PM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney Joseph David Daley for Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund, in case 21-15785. [12098659] (HH) [Entered: 04/30/2021 03:37 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Joseph D. Daley (Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, 655 W Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101) for Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund. Date of service: 04/30/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12098599] [21-15785] (Daley, Joseph) [Entered: 04/30/2021 03:10 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/06/2021. Appellant Local 353, I.B.E.W. Pension Fund opening brief due 06/29/2021. Appellees Elena Gomez, Mikkel Svane and Zendesk, Inc. answering brief due 07/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12097227] (RT) [Entered: 04/29/2021 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.