Richard Russell v. University of Arizona, et al
| RICHARD ALAN RUSSELL, V.C. |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, UArizona, DOCTOR KEVIN F. MOYNAHAN, DOCTOR TAYLOR RIALL, DOCTOR RICHARD KUMET, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, named as College of Medicine - Tucson, COM, ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, DOCTOR SEAN P. ELLIOTT and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Co-conspirators: i. Medical Doctors (i.e. doctors) , ii. UArizona contracted employees, iii. contracted or cooperative, persons and entities with UArizona |
| 21-15803 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON): A review of the record and appellants response to this courts May 4, 2021 order to show cause demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the April 29, 2021 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on March 25, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12140893] (AF) [Entered: 06/10/2021 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Richard Alan Russell undated letter re: 4th letter to 9th Cir.. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12127758] (DJV) [Entered: 05/28/2021 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Richard Alan Russell undated letter re: request name of judicial officer. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12114759] (DJV) [Entered: 05/17/2021 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts judgment was entered on the docket on March 25, 2021. Appellants notice of appeal was filed in the district court on April 29, 2021. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12101957] (CKP) [Entered: 05/04/2021 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Richard Alan Russell opening brief due 06/28/2021. [12099670] (JMR) [Entered: 05/03/2021 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
