Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Travis Scott, et al
| PAMALA OLMSTEAD, DAVID SHINN, Director, ADAM HENRY, Senior Chaplain, NATHANIEL HARRIS, #1495, MARQUEZ, First name unknown; COII - SMUII A21 Eyman Complex, DE LA CRUZ, First name unknown; CO III #2044, TRAVIS SCOTT, BREWER, First name unknown; Captain SMUII, A21 Eyman Complex, MALVIN WILLIS, Senior Chaplain, KENNETH HERMAN, Director, Religious Service and SERRATO, First name unknown; Sgt SMUII A21 Eyman |
| SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud |
| 21-15838 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, JHN and RDN) [12163112] (RL) [Entered: 07/06/2021 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12141718] (WL) [Entered: 06/11/2021 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE OF APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Bin Talal Al Saud opening brief due 07/02/2021. [12107537] (JMR) [Entered: 05/10/2021 12:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
