Triton Property Investments v. Richard George, et al
TRITON PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC |
SANDRINE CLARK and RICHARD GEORGE |
21-15903 |
May 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, JHN and RDN) [12161097] (DJV) [Entered: 07/02/2021 06:38 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Kunzi v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 833 F.2d 1291, 1293 (9th Cir. 1987) (order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not reviewable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12141047] (AF) [Entered: 06/10/2021 04:05 PM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12122139] (DJV) [Entered: 05/24/2021 10:11 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Sandrine Clark and Richard George opening brief due 07/20/2021. Appellee Triton Property Investments, LLC answering brief due 08/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12121219] (JBS) [Entered: 05/21/2021 01:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.