Michael McRae v. Bairamian Dikran, et al
| KEVIN CUOHG NGUYEN, Health Care Provider at Memorial Medical Center, Modesto, BUREAU OF PRISONS, ADRIAN KUMAR, Health Care Provider at Memorial Medical Center, Modesto, DAVID BETZ, Health Care Provider at Memorial Medical Center, Modesto and BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, Health Care Provider at Memorial Medical Center Modesto |
| MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE |
| 21-15925 |
| May 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12141812] (WL) [Entered: 06/11/2021 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Scott McRae opening brief due 07/26/2021. Appellees David Betz, Bureau of Prisons, Bairamian Dikran, Adrian Kumar and Kevin Cuohg Nguyen answering brief due 08/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12127253] (RT) [Entered: 05/27/2021 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
