Kohen Uhuru v. R. Singh, et al
| KIM PETERSEN, C. BROWN, A. CHAUDHRY, MICHAEL SCAMURRA, R. SINGH, B. MICHELS and KARLA SOLIS |
| KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Diallo Dynomite, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru |
| 21-15932 |
| May 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Kohen Diallo Uhuru motion for appointment of counsel. Paper filing deficiency: Case closed; Mandate issued. [12175901] (RR) [Entered: 07/19/2021 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Kohen Diallo Uhuru opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/12/2021. Major deficiency: case is closed. Notified Appellant. [12175134] (LA) [Entered: 07/16/2021 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, JHN and RDN) [12163324] (RR) [Entered: 07/06/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order); see also In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12141967] (WL) [Entered: 06/11/2021 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kohen Diallo Uhuru opening brief due 07/26/2021. Appellees answering brief due 08/24/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12128071] (JMR) [Entered: 05/28/2021 12:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
