Charles Kinney v. USA, et al
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and E. M. CHEN
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES G. KINNEY and CHARLES KINNEY
Case Number: 21-15942
Filed: June 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2021 Filing 5 Received copy of pleading filed in district court re: Objection and demand to send the amended appeal to the Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Pleading filed by Appellant Charles Kinney. [12183480] (QDL) [Entered: 07/26/2021 04:39 PM]
July 26, 2021 Filing 4 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. [12183466] (QDL) [Entered: 07/26/2021 04:33 PM]
July 23, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Charles Kinney objection and remand to vacate order and recall the mandate . Deficiencies: No further filings per 7/19/2021 order (sent docket) . [12181866] (JFF) [Entered: 07/23/2021 03:58 PM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 2 Filed order (JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed May 24, 2021 and amended notice of appeal filed May 27, 2021 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 17-80256. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 21-15942 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Northern District of California, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [12175939] (OC) [Entered: 07/19/2021 10:44 AM]
June 1, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 17-80256. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12129464] (JBS) [Entered: 06/01/2021 11:44 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Kinney v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: E. M. CHEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHARLES G. KINNEY
Represented By: Charles G. Kinney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHARLES KINNEY
Represented By: Charles Kinney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?