National Lifeline Association v. Marybel Batjer, et al
| NATIONAL LIFELINE ASSOCIATION |
| GENEVIEVE SHIROMA, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, MARYBEL BATJER, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, LIANE RANDOLPH, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN, in his official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission and MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission |
| 21-15969 |
| June 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| NATIONAL LIFELINE ASSOCIATION V. MARYBEL BATJER, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record and the response to this courts June 8, 2021 order reflects that the district court has denied the post-judgment motion. Accordingly, the stay of appellate proceedings is lifted, and briefing may proceed. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due September 20, 2021. The answering brief is due October 20, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12176482] (JBS) [Entered: 07/19/2021 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Marybel Batjer, Martha Guzman Aceves, Liane Randolph, Clifford Rechtschaffen and Genevieve Shiroma response to Court order dated 06/08/2021. Date of service: 07/15/2021 [12173857] [21-15969]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 07/15/2021 by SLM] (Vinogradov, Inna) [Entered: 07/15/2021 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/11/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12142512]. [21-15969] (AD) [Entered: 06/11/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Marybel Batjer, Martha Guzman Aceves, Liane Randolph, Clifford Rechtschaffen and Genevieve Shiroma Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/11/2021. [12142074] [21-15969] (Vinogradov, Inna) [Entered: 06/11/2021 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellants shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellants intend to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [12138016] (TSP) [Entered: 06/08/2021 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Marybel Batjer, Martha Guzman Aceves, Liane Randolph, Clifford Rechtschaffen and Genevieve Shiroma Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/11/2021. Transcript ordered by 07/06/2021. Transcript due 08/03/2021. Appellants Marybel Batjer, Martha Guzman Aceves, Liane Randolph, Clifford Rechtschaffen and Genevieve Shiroma opening brief due 09/13/2021. Appellee National Lifeline Association answering brief due 10/12/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12134500] (HH) [Entered: 06/04/2021 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: National Lifeline Association v. Marybel Batjer, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: NATIONAL LIFELINE ASSOCIATION | |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey White Castello Esquire III |
| Represented By: | Becca Wahlquist |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: GENEVIEVE SHIROMA, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Arocles Aguilar Esquire |
| Represented By: | Helen M. Mickiewicz |
| Represented By: | Inna Vinogradov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MARYBEL BATJER, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Arocles Aguilar Esquire |
| Represented By: | Helen M. Mickiewicz |
| Represented By: | Inna Vinogradov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: LIANE RANDOLPH, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Arocles Aguilar Esquire |
| Represented By: | Helen M. Mickiewicz |
| Represented By: | Inna Vinogradov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN, in his official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Arocles Aguilar Esquire |
| Represented By: | Helen M. Mickiewicz |
| Represented By: | Inna Vinogradov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Arocles Aguilar Esquire |
| Represented By: | Helen M. Mickiewicz |
| Represented By: | Inna Vinogradov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
