Lee Beitman v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
Defendant: CORRECT CLEAR SOLUTIONS, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Doe 1, Healthcare Provider at Correct Clear Solutions; Doe 2, Healthcare Provider at Corizon Health Incorporated and BENNIE ROLLINS
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, MARTIN GRUENBERG, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CHARLES L. RYAN and CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Contracted Health Care Provider at ADOC
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEE MICHAEL BEITMAN
Case Number: 21-16000
Filed: June 11, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2021 Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellees Corizon Health, Inc. and Charles L. Ryan response opposing motion ([ # 16 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 08/03/2021. [12190919] [21-16000] (Bustos, Rita) [Entered: 08/03/2021 02:33 PM]
July 26, 2021 Filing 16 Filed Appellant Lee Michael Beitman motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/20/2021. [12183644] (DJV) [Entered: 07/27/2021 06:28 AM]
July 26, 2021 Filing 15 Terminated - Correct Clear Solutions in 21-16000 [12183065] (WL) [Entered: 07/26/2021 01:45 PM]
July 26, 2021 Filing 14 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) to correct the caption is granted. The Clerk will remove defendant Correct Clear Solutions from the docket. Defendant Correct Care Solutions remains an appellee in this appeal. The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief remains due September 13, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will provide appellant with a copy of the docket sheet in this case. [12183059] (WL) [Entered: 07/26/2021 01:43 PM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 13 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Lee Michael Beitman opening brief of 20 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/15/2021. [12177260] (KWG) [Entered: 07/20/2021 08:30 AM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 12 Added Attorney(s) Sarah Miller Barnes for party(s) Appellee David Shinn, in case 21-16000. [12176450] (DJV) [Entered: 07/19/2021 02:20 PM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 11 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12176442] (AF) [Entered: 07/19/2021 02:17 PM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sarah L. Barnes (Broening Oberg Woods & Wilson, 2800 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1600, Phoenix, AZ 85004) for Appellee David Shinn. Date of service: 07/19/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12176435] [21-16000] (Barnes, Sarah) [Entered: 07/19/2021 02:14 PM]
July 2, 2021 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Lee Michael Beitman motion to correct caption. Deficiencies: None. [12164436] (RR) [Entered: 07/07/2021 05:40 AM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 8 Attorneys Denise Troy and Denise Troy in 21-16000 substituted by Attorneys Vail C. Cloar and Vail C. Cloar in 21-16000 [12156108] (DJV) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:00 PM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Vail C. Cloar (Dickinson Wright PLLC, 1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400, Phoenix, AZ 85004) for Appellees Correct Care Solutions and Martin Gruenberg. Substitution for Attorney Denise Troy for Appellees Correct Care Solutions and Martin Gruenberg. Date of service: 06/28/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12156094] [21-16000] (Cloar, Vail) [Entered: 06/28/2021 11:55 AM]
June 25, 2021 Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By July 16, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12154378] (AF) [Entered: 06/25/2021 10:06 AM]
June 22, 2021 Filing 5 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 06/22/2021. [12151045] (RT) [Entered: 06/22/2021 02:14 PM]
June 22, 2021 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12150704] (CKP) [Entered: 06/22/2021 11:30 AM]
June 14, 2021 Filing 3 Attorneys Anthony J. Fernandez, Anthony J. Fernandez and Anthony J. Fernandez in 21-16000 substituted by Attorneys Rita Bustos, Rita Bustos and Rita Bustos in 21-16000 [12142725] (DJV) [Entered: 06/14/2021 08:16 AM]
June 14, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Rita J. Bustos (Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, PA, 8800 East Raintree Drive, Suite 100, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260) for Appellee Corizon Health, Inc.. Substitution for Attorney Anthony J. Fernandez for Appellees Corizon Health, Inc., Charles L. Ryan and David Shinn. Date of service: 06/14/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12142701] [21-16000] (Bustos, Rita) [Entered: 06/14/2021 08:00 AM]
June 11, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT . SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lee Michael Beitman opening brief due 08/11/2021. Appellees Corizon Health, Inc., Correct Care Solutions, Martin Gruenberg, Charles L. Ryan and David Shinn, Director answering brief due 09/13/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12142095] (RT) [Entered: 06/11/2021 02:14 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lee Beitman v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director
Represented By: Rita Bustos
Represented By: Sarah Miller Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARTIN GRUENBERG
Represented By: Denise Troy
Represented By: Vail C. Cloar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS
Represented By: Denise Troy
Represented By: Vail C. Cloar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN
Represented By: Rita Bustos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Contracted Health Care Provider at ADOC
Represented By: Rita Bustos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LEE MICHAEL BEITMAN
Represented By: Lee Michael Beitman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORRECT CLEAR SOLUTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, Doe 1, Healthcare Provider at Correct Clear Solutions; Doe 2, Healthcare Provider at Corizon Health Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BENNIE ROLLINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?