Arquimedes Mendoza v. Matthew Cate
MATTHEW CATE |
ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA |
21-16018 |
June 15, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA V. MATTHEW CATE |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Streamlined request [4] by Appellant Arquimedes Mendoza to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Arquimedes Mendoza opening brief due 09/15/2021. Appellee Matthew Cate answering brief due 10/15/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12195514] (DLM) [Entered: 08/09/2021 11:49 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Arquimedes Mendoza. New requested due date is 09/15/2021. [12194927] [21-16018] (Bigelow, Michael) [Entered: 08/08/2021 08:25 AM] |
Filing 3 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Michael Bradley Bigelow, Esquire for Arquimedes Mendoza) [12178238] (BJK) [Entered: 07/20/2021 04:30 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): This 28 U.S.C. 2254 action is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of issuing a modified certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). In the modified certificate of appealability, the court should specify which issue(s) meet the requisite showing. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2), (c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court. (MOATT) [12154912] (TSP) [Entered: 06/25/2021 02:25 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Arquimedes Mendoza opening brief due 08/16/2021. Appellee Matthew Cate answering brief due 09/16/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12144652] (RT) [Entered: 06/15/2021 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Arquimedes Mendoza v. Matthew Cate | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: MATTHEW CATE | |
Represented By: | Justain P. Riley |
Represented By: | Catherine Chatman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA | |
Represented By: | Michael Bradley Bigelow Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.