Ernest Guardado v. State of Nevada, et al
| STATE OF NEVADA, RICHARD SNYDER, JULIO CALDERIN, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, JENNIFER NASH, Associate Warden, HAROLD WICKHAM, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, K. THOMAS, Dep Dir Pro and JAMES DZURENDA, Director |
| ERNEST JORD GUARDADO |
| 21-16068 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ERNEST GUARDADO V. STATE OF NEVADA, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Ernest Jord Guardado motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12179159] (QDL) [Entered: 07/21/2021 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Ernest Jord Guardado motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12179154] (QDL) [Entered: 07/21/2021 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The June 23, 2021 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending October 20, 2020 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant must file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [12165176] (CKP) [Entered: 07/07/2021 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 Terminated Henry H. Kim for Brian Williams, Harold Wickham, K. Thomas, Richard Snyder, Jennifer Nash, James Dzurenda and Julio Calderin in 21-16068 [12163071] (QDL) [Entered: 07/06/2021 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Frank Anthony Toddre II for party(s) Appellee Brian Williams, Appellee Harold Wickham, Appellee K. Thomas, Appellee Richard Snyder, Appellee Julio Calderin, Appellee State of Nevada, Appellee James Dzurenda, Appellee Jennifer Nash and Appellee NDOC, in case 21-16068. [12163066] (QDL) [Entered: 07/06/2021 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Frank A. Toddre (Nevada State Attorney General's Office, 555 E. Washington Ave. Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellees Julio Calderin, James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash, NDOC, Richard Snyder, State of Nevada, K. Thomas, Harold Wickham and Brian Williams. Substitution for Attorney Henry H. Kim for Appellees Julio Calderin, James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash, Richard Snyder, K. Thomas, Harold Wickham and Brian Williams. Date of service: 07/06/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12163044] [21-16068] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 07/06/2021 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 Entered appearance of Court Reporter Amber Freeman in this case. [12153552] (JPD) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ernest Jord Guardado opening brief due 08/23/2021. Appellees James Dzurenda, et al. answering brief due 09/21/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12153540] (JPD) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
