Francisco Martinez Franco v. David Jennings, et al
| FRANCISCO JAVIER MARTINEZ FRANCO |
| IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DAVID W. JENNINGS, CHAD F. WOLF, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and MATTHEW T. ALBENCE |
| 21-16087 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Attorney Rosanne Perry in 21-16087 substituted by Attorney Sarah Stevens Wilson in 21-16087 [12172725] (NAC) [Entered: 07/14/2021 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sarah Stevens Wilson (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, PO Box 878, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellants Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr, ICE, David W. Jennings and Chad F. Wolf. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Rosanne Perry for Appellants Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr, ICE, David W. Jennings and Chad F. Wolf. Date of service: 07/14/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12172708] [21-16087] (Wilson, Sarah) [Entered: 07/14/2021 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr, Attorney General, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, David W. Jennings and Chad F. Wolf opening brief due 08/30/2021. Appellee Francisco Javier Martinez Franco answering brief due 09/30/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12156175] (RT) [Entered: 06/28/2021 12:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
