Raquel Chavez, et al v. Roahn Wynar, et al
Plaintiff: RITO CHAVEZ, LIFE SAVERS CONCEPTS ASSOCIATION, INC., LIFE SAVERS CONCEPTS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA and ESEQUIEL LOMBERA
Defendant: ALICIA COX and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: RAQUEL CHAVEZ and LUPITA CHAVEZ
Defendant / Appellant: ROAHN WYNAR
Case Number: 21-16094
Filed: June 29, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 16, 2023 LUPITA CHAVEZ, ET AL V. ROAHN WYNAR, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2021 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 08/11/2021, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12168629] (CL) [Entered: 07/09/2021 03:24 PM]
July 6, 2021 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/06/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12164362]. [21-16094] (AD) [Entered: 07/06/2021 06:44 PM]
July 6, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Roahn Wynar Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/06/2021. [12164350] [21-16094] (Jeu, Christopher) [Entered: 07/06/2021 06:01 PM]
July 2, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Villanueva v. California, 986 F.3d 1158, 1164 (9th Cir. 2021) (court of appeals has jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity only to the extent that it turns on an issue of law) (citation omitted). The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12162077] (AF) [Entered: 07/02/2021 03:13 PM]
June 29, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roahn Wynar Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/06/2021. Transcript ordered by 07/28/2021. Transcript due 08/27/2021. Appellant Roahn Wynar opening brief due 10/06/2021. Appellees Lupita Chavez and Raquel Chavez answering brief due 11/05/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12157498] (JBS) [Entered: 06/29/2021 12:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raquel Chavez, et al v. Roahn Wynar, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RITO CHAVEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LIFE SAVERS CONCEPTS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LIFE SAVERS CONCEPTS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ESEQUIEL LOMBERA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: RAQUEL CHAVEZ
Represented By: Michael Stoller
Represented By: Charles Thomas Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LUPITA CHAVEZ
Represented By: Michael Stoller
Represented By: Charles Thomas Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALICIA COX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ROAHN WYNAR
Represented By: Christopher F. Jeu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?