Evanston Insurance Company v. Tracee Portee Murphy, et al
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY |
CHERELLE MURPHY, ARTHUR MURPHY, LATOYA MURPHY, ADRIONE MURPHY, EUGENE SCOTT, JUWAN MURPHY, JACORI MURPHY, ALIJAH MURPHY, SEDALE PORTEE, RICKY TAYLOR, PEARCE LINCOLN PROPERTIES LLC, PAR-TECH LP, ARTS FISHERIES II LLC, RAYMOND CANTY, DBA Soul Brothers and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe and Jane Doe 1-5 |
TRACEE PORTEE MURPHY |
21-16116 |
July 2, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY V. TRACEE PORTEE MURPHY |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12194355] (VS) [Entered: 08/06/2021 02:22 PM] |
Filing 8 Terminated attorney Zaruhi Torosyan for appellee Evanston Insurance Company in 21-16116 .[12188384] (HH) [Entered: 07/30/2021 03:36 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Zaruhi Torosyan for Appellee Evanston Insurance Company. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 07/30/2021. [12188362] [21-16116] (Torosyan, Zaruhi) [Entered: 07/30/2021 03:28 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 08/05/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12180663] (VS) [Entered: 07/22/2021 04:19 PM] |
Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Zaruhi Torosyan for party(s) Appellee Evanston Insurance Company, in case 21-16116. [12171048] (DJV) [Entered: 07/13/2021 01:04 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Zara H. Torosyan (Clark Hill PLC; 14850 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 500, Scottsdale, AZ 85254) for Appellee Evanston Insurance Company. Date of service: 07/13/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12171031] [21-16116] (Torosyan, Zaruhi) [Entered: 07/13/2021 12:58 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/07/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12165820]. [21-16116] (AD) [Entered: 07/07/2021 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tracee Portee Murphy Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/07/2021. [12165174] [21-16116] (Combs, Lincoln) [Entered: 07/07/2021 01:24 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tracee Portee Murphy Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/09/2021. Transcript ordered by 08/02/2021. Transcript due 09/01/2021. Appellant Tracee Portee Murphy opening brief due 10/12/2021. Appellee Evanston Insurance Company answering brief due 11/12/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12161321] (RT) [Entered: 07/02/2021 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.