Eugene Korte v. State of California, et al
| EUGENE KORTE, DBA EFK Systems |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SOLANO, SOLANO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, SOLANO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, VACAVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, VACAVILLE CITY HALL, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, DSL EXTREME, AT&T CORPORATE OFFICE, VERIZON WIRELESS, COMCAST CORPORATION, SHELLY SINGLETON, MARIE EUBANKS, DENNIS W. BUNTING, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, NORMAN GORTON and SHAHROKH BAKHTYARI |
| 21-16145 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 21-6057 Filed on: 09/21/2021 Cert Petition Action 1: Denied, 01/10/2022 [12335759] (RL) [Entered: 01/10/2022 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 9 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 21-6057 Filed on: 09/21/2021 Cert Petition Action 1: Pending [12268631] (RR) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDH, PJW and KKL) [12253562] (JFF) [Entered: 10/12/2021 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) Upon a review of the record and the response to the courts July 23, 2021 order, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]), see 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [12231321] (OC) [Entered: 09/17/2021 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Eugene Korte FORM 16 Circuit Rule 27-3 certificate for emergency motion. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/11/2021. [12202762] (RL) [Entered: 08/16/2021 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Eugene Korte statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 08/11/2021. [12202748] (RL) [Entered: 08/16/2021 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12181597] (OC) [Entered: 07/23/2021 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Eugene Korte motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12178129] (JFF) [Entered: 07/20/2021 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12169701] (CKP) [Entered: 07/12/2021 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eugene Korte opening brief due 09/07/2021. [12167673] (JMR) [Entered: 07/09/2021 09:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
