Shirley Remmert, et al v. State of California, et al
| SHIRLEY VENOYA REMMERT and EVA D. AL-ZAGHARI |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor, SAN MATEO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, GEORGE A. MIRAM, in his capacity as a judicial officer in the State of Californai, ROSENDO PADILLA, San Mateo County Deputy County Counsel, VANESSA OSUNA, Deputy Public Guardian, LONNY DAVIS and REX ADAMSON, M.D. |
| 21-16151 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Mail returned on 08/23/2021 addressed to Eva D. Al-Zaghari, re: [ # 4 ] Clerk Order. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found [12211463] (JBS) [Entered: 08/25/2021 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 Mail returned on 08/09/2021 addressed to Eva D. Al-Zaghari, re: [ # 1 ] Case Opening Document. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, no such number, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [12200154] (LA) [Entered: 08/12/2021 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 Mail returned on 08/05/2021 addressed to Eva D. Al-Zaghari, re: [ # 2 ] Clerk Order. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, no such number, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [12196355] (LA) [Entered: 08/09/2021 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Shirley Venoya Remmert letter dated 06/28/2021 re: addendum to DE 3. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12181598] (DJV) [Entered: 07/23/2021 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellants must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellants do not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellants file a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellants submit any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellants: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellants may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12181587] (OC) [Entered: 07/23/2021 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12169750] (CKP) [Entered: 07/12/2021 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANTS AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Eva D. Al-Zaghari and Shirley Venoya Remmert opening brief due 09/10/2021. . [12168164] (RT) [Entered: 07/09/2021 12:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
