Misty Brown v. Megan Brennan
| MISTY DANIELLE BROWN |
| MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Post Master General |
| 21-16154 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: th): Granting Appellant's Motion [ # 6 ] to extend time to file opening brief. Appellant Misty Danielle Brown opening brief due 02/10/2022. Appellee Megan J. Brennan answering brief due 03/14/2022. The appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12281752] (TH) [Entered: 11/08/2021 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Misty Danielle Brown FORM 14 motion for extension of time. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/08/2021. [12281705] (RL) [Entered: 11/08/2021 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 Streamlined request by Appellant Misty Danielle Brown to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Misty Danielle Brown opening brief due 11/08/2021. Appellee Megan J. Brennan answering brief due 12/08/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12251421] (JN) [Entered: 10/07/2021 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12236245] (OC) [Entered: 09/22/2021 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The time period within which the parties may respond to this court's order dated July 15, 2021, is extended to August 27, 2021. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellant's opening brief is due October 7, 2021; appellee's answering brief is due November 9, 2021; appellant's optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [12186059 (OC) [Entered: 07/28/2021 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By July 29, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12173805] (OC) [Entered: 07/15/2021 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Misty Danielle Brown opening brief due 09/07/2021. Appellee Megan J. Brennan answering brief due 10/05/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12168507] (JMR) [Entered: 07/09/2021 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Misty Brown v. Megan Brennan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: MISTY DANIELLE BROWN | |
| Represented By: | Misty Danielle Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Post Master General | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Johann |
| Represented By: | John Wesley Samples |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
