Ronald Adams v. CDCR, et al
| RONALD ADAMS |
| CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Secretary, STEVEN C. SUZUKAWA, Superior Court Judge, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Court Judge, EDWARD LEAVY, Circuit Court Judge, T. MONTGOMERY, Case records analyst, JOSE GASTELO, Warden, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary |
| 21-16167 |
| July 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Ronald Adams motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 08/12/2021. Deficiencies: None. [12212835] (QDL) [Entered: 08/26/2021 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 Streamlined request by Appellant Ronald Adams to extend time to file the brief is not approved because briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [12212784] (JN) [Entered: 08/26/2021 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied because appellant has had three or more prior actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and appellant has not alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); see also Adams v. Grannis, Appeal No. 09-cv-15715 (9th Cir. Dec. 10, 2009); Adams v. Rowland, et al., No. 91-cv-4090-RFP (N.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 1991); Adams v. Vazquez, et al., Civil Case No. 09-cv-15715-OWW (E.D. Cal. May 21, 2009). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Failure to pay the fees will result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [12199872] (OC) [Entered: 08/12/2021 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ronald Adams motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12189562] (QDL) [Entered: 08/02/2021 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12173957] (CKP) [Entered: 07/15/2021 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ronald Adams opening brief due 09/07/2021. [12171068] (JPD) [Entered: 07/13/2021 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appellee Leavy in 21-16167 substituted by Appellee Edward LEAVY in 21-16167 [12170975] (SLM) [Entered: 07/13/2021 12:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
