Jurel Roberson v. Attorney General for the State, et al
| CHARLES L. RYAN |
| JUREL DION ROBERSON |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director |
| 21-16197 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Jurel Dion Roberson letter dated 08/13/2021 re: Docket fee. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12204705] (QDL) [Entered: 08/18/2021 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Jurel Dion Roberson motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/16/2021. [12204700] (QDL) [Entered: 08/18/2021 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 08/16/2021. [12203673] (RT) [Entered: 08/17/2021 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 4 Check number 500469139 in the amount of $505.00, forwarded to district court. (See Case Files) [12197654] (JR) [Entered: 08/10/2021 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by September 3, 2021. [12190601] (AF) [Entered: 08/03/2021 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Jurel Dion Roberson motion to extend time to file COA request. Deficiencies: None. [12184464] (NAC) [Entered: 07/27/2021 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/28/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12175245] (WL) [Entered: 07/16/2021 04:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
