Fred Devine v. Chapman, et al
PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHOENIX FIRE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHOENIX, LENTZ, Unknown; Captain for Phoenix Fire Dept. E-28 and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does #1 thru #4, Phoenix Police Officers; named as John Does #1 thru #4, Phoenix Firemen |
FRED DEVINE |
CHAPMAN, Unknown; #4831, WIBBING, Unknown; #7673, BILL, Unknown; #7450, HELMS, Unknown; #7164 and BERRELLEZA, Unknown; #8025 Officer for Phoenix Police Department |
21-16207 |
July 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (JW): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [12215290] (AF) [Entered: 08/30/2021 01:53 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (BS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Participants with an email address on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If an email address is not listed or if there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Participants may also leave a message at (415) 355-7900 to request dial-in information. Finally, please notify Circuit Mediator Jonathan Westen immediately by email (Jonathan_Westen@ca9.uscourts.gov) if a participant has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all participants on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. (Date: August 26, 2021 Time: 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time) (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12201093] (AF) [Entered: 08/13/2021 01:43 PM] |
Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12196266] (CKP) [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:31 PM] |
Filing 4 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 08/03/2021. [Case Number 21-16207: Partially Paid] [12195946] (DJV) [Entered: 08/09/2021 02:27 PM] |
Filing 3 Received on 7/20/21 pro se copy of amended notice of appeal . [12181281] (DJV) [Entered: 07/23/2021 11:32 AM] |
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12179070] (CKP) [Entered: 07/21/2021 02:21 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Fred Devine opening brief due 09/23/2021. Appellees Berrelleza, Bill, Chapman, Helms and Wibbing answering brief due 10/25/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12178534] (RT) [Entered: 07/21/2021 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.