CPC Patent Technologies PTY Lt v. Apple, Inc.
Petitioner / Appellant: CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.
Respondent / Appellee: APPLE, INC.
Case Number: 21-16212
Filed: July 21, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 18, 2022 Summary CPC PATENT TECHS. PTY LTD. V. APPLE, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2021 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12231976] (VS) [Entered: 09/17/2021 02:17 PM]
August 18, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Seth M. Sproul (Fish & Richardson PC 12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92130) for Appellee Apple, Inc.. Substitution for Attorney Seth Sproul for Appellee Apple, Inc.. Date of service: 08/18/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12205208] [21-16212] (Sproul, Seth) [Entered: 08/18/2021 04:10 PM]
August 6, 2021 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 08/19/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12193782] (VS) [Entered: 08/06/2021 09:06 AM]
July 28, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/28/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12186187]. [21-16212] (AD) [Entered: 07/28/2021 06:44 PM]
July 28, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant CPC Patent Technologies PTY Ltd. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/28/2021. [12186157] [21-16212] (Goodrich, Christina) [Entered: 07/28/2021 05:14 PM]
July 21, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant CPC Patent Technologies PTY Ltd. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/28/2021. Appellant CPC Patent Technologies PTY Ltd. opening brief due 09/23/2021. Appellee Apple, Inc. answering brief due 10/25/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12179142] (RT) [Entered: 07/21/2021 02:41 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: CPC Patent Technologies PTY Lt v. Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.
Represented By: Christina Noel Goodrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: APPLE, INC.
Represented By: Seth Sproul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?