The Miller Law Firm, LLC, et al v. Laborde Earles Law Firm, et al
| In re: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION |
| THE MILLER LAW FIRM, LLC and WEITZ & LUXENBERG |
| LABORDE EARLES LAW FIRM, BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD, LLP, PENDLEY BAUDIN & COFFIN, LLP, CAREY DANIS & LOWE, HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC, LANIER LAW FIRM, P.C., TAUTFEST BOND, PLLC, WATTS GUERRA, LLP, NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLC, GOLDSTEIN & RUSSELL, P.C., BEASELY ALLEN CROW METHVIN PORTIS AND MILES, P.C., FEARS NACHAWATI, PLLC, DALIMONTE RUEB STOLLER, LLP, JOHNSON LAW GROUP, THE GORI LAW FIRM, P.C., ONDER LAW, LLC, SINGELTON SCHREIBER MCKENZIE & SCOTT, HUTTON & HUTTON LAW FIRM, LLC, PULASKI KHERKHER PLLC, GIBBS LAW GROUP, LLP, TRAMMELL, P.C., KIRKENDALL DWYER, LLP, GOLDBERG & OSBORNE, LLP and ROMANUCCI & BLANDIN, LLC |
| 21-16228 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| IN RE: THE MILLER LAW FIRM, LLC, ET AL V. LABORDE EARLES LAW FIRM, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Added Attorney(s) Eric Richard Nitz for party(s) Appellee Tautfest Bond, PLLC Appellee Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC Appellee Watts Guerra, LLP Appellee Lanier Law Firm, P.C. Appellee Carey Danis & Lowe, in case 21-16228. [12230524] (RR) [Entered: 09/16/2021 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Eric R. Nitz (MoloLamken, 600 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20037) for Appellees Carey Danis & Lowe, Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Lanier Law Firm, P.C., Tautfest Bond, PLLC and Watts Guerra, LLP. Date of service: 09/15/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12229868] [21-16228] (Nitz, Eric) [Entered: 09/15/2021 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 10 Added Attorney(s) Leonid Grinberg for party(s) Appellee Tautfest Bond, PLLC Appellee Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC Appellee Watts Guerra, LLP Appellee Lanier Law Firm, P.C. Appellee Carey Danis & Lowe, in case 21-16228. [12229841] (RR) [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Leonid Grinberg (MoloLamken LLP, 430 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10022) for Appellees Carey Danis & Lowe, Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Lanier Law Firm, P.C., Tautfest Bond, PLLC and Watts Guerra, LLP. Date of service: 09/15/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12229820] [21-16228] (Grinberg, Leonid) [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12211826] (BLS) [Entered: 08/25/2021 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 08/24/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12190416] (BLS) [Entered: 08/03/2021 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that the order challenged in this appeal may not be final or appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291. Accordingly, in addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address the basis for this courts jurisdiction to review the challenged order. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12188133] (WL) [Entered: 07/30/2021 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/28/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12185555]. [21-16228] (AD) [Entered: 07/28/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Weitz & Luxenberg Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/28/2021. [12185445] [21-16228] (Golanski, Alani) [Entered: 07/28/2021 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Arati C. Furness in 21-16228 substituted by Attorney Sherri Ann Saucer in 21-16228 [12183750] (QDL) [Entered: 07/27/2021 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sherri Ann Saucer (Fears Nachawati, PLLC, 5473 Blair Rd, Dallas, TX 75231) for Appellee Fears Nachawati, PLLC. Substitution for Attorney Arati C. Furness for Appellee Fears Nachawati, PLLC. Date of service: 07/27/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12183742] [21-16228] (Saucer, Sherri) [Entered: 07/27/2021 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants The Miller Law Firm, LLC and Weitz & Luxenberg Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/02/2021. Transcript ordered by 08/24/2021. Transcript due 09/23/2021. Appellants The Miller Law Firm, LLC and Weitz & Luxenberg opening brief due 11/02/2021. Appellees Beasely Allen Crow Methvin Portis and Miles, P.C., Bernstein Liebhard, LLP, Carey Danis & Lowe, Dalimonte Rueb Stoller, LLP, Fears Nachawati, PLLC, Gibbs Law Group, LLP, Goldberg & Osborne, LLP, Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Hutton & Hutton Law Firm, LLC, Johnson Law Group, Kirkendall Dwyer, LLP, Laborde Earles Law Firm, Lanier Law Firm, P.C., Napoli Shkolnik, PLLC, Onder Law, LLC, Pendley Baudin & Coffin, LLP, Pulaski Kherkher PLLC, Romanucci & Blandin, LLC, Singelton Schreiber McKenzie & Scott, Tautfest Bond, PLLC, The Gori Law Firm, P.C., Trammell, P.C. and Watts Guerra, LLP answering brief due 12/02/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12183148] (RT) [Entered: 07/26/2021 02:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
