James Washington v. Joe Lizarraga
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES WASHINGTON
Respondent / Appellee: JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden
Case Number: 21-16247
Filed: July 30, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2021 Filing 2 Filed Appellant James Washington motion for certificate of appealability, to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12212673] (JFF) [Entered: 08/26/2021 03:10 PM]
July 30, 2021 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 06/28/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12187839] (WL) [Entered: 07/30/2021 10:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Washington v. Joe Lizarraga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JAMES WASHINGTON
Represented By: James Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden
Represented By: Craig Steven Meyers Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?